# Grape DAO/DAO Board Restructuring

**URL:** <https://dao.grapenetwork.org/t/grape-dao-dao-board-restructuring/858>\
**Category:** DAO\
**Created:** [March 22, 2022, 5:09pm UTC](https://dao.grapenetwork.org/t/grape-dao-dao-board-restructuring/858 "2022-03-22T17:09:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![voldenwolf](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/dao.grapenetwork.org/voldenwolf/32/738_2.png) [@voldenwolf](https://dao.grapenetwork.org/u/voldenwolf)\
**Post date:** [March 22, 2022, 5:36pm UTC](https://dao.grapenetwork.org/t/grape-dao-dao-board-restructuring/858/2 "2022-03-22T17:36:16Z")

</div>

This is well thought out. A few questions/thoughts for consideration.

1. DAO Core - would consider making this a position of say maybe 4 or 6 months which then goes up for re-election again (similar to how the Board is rotational). The same member can obviously serve for longer than [6] months as part of the Core, but its important to have an on/off ramp.
2. How would emissions be determined for DAO Core? If its determined by the DAO Board we may want a few members in DAO Board who are not part of DAO Core.

---

_[View the full topic](https://dao.grapenetwork.org/t/grape-dao-dao-board-restructuring/858)._