Not really against it but we had a WL channel before called giveaways which was also around WL allocations and the thing is most projects like 1/10 turn out to be “good” that is above mint price for ‘x’ time.
Meaning that most community members who had the risk to mint with the WL provided by Grape came out PL negative which results for the member to perceive a negative opinion about WL’s provided in that channel.
Of course every WL’s are purely a choice done by the community member and the “WL’s hunters” are not at fault there.
My proposal is if we procceed with this, surely we can offer 1000 $GRAPE for each WL brought and 1500 $GRAPE for every WL mint succeed but if the project goes undermint or just cashgrab the community member who brought should be penalized 1500 $GRAPE too.
Only with rewards and discipline things are often much of better quality.
EDIT: Another solution is to start without rewards and if the PL of the WL provided turns out to be positive then yes we can reward the WL provider.