January Emissions -Rough Draft - Speak now or forever hold your piece

The revised proposal will be posted after Sunday’s call.
** If there is any glaring mistakes, and you fail to mention it till after the wheels are in motion too bad. We all have a duty to check on each other. **

1.Membership emission:

Roles $GRAPE Accounts Total $GRAPE
Gibbons 55 2230 XXXXXX
Great Apes 270 1070 XXXXXX
Gorillas 1100 559 XXXXXX

2. Market Maker Loan (3rd of 12th month)

  • $GRAPE- 833,000

3. Skill Roles

Roles $GRAPE Accounts Total $GRAPE %Change
Crew 10,000.00 21 210,000
Researcher tiered 11 120,000
Creative tiered XX 462,500
Moderator tiered 11 275,000
Organizer tiered 9 42,000
Developer 16,000.00 8 128,000
Calendar 5,000.00 4 20,000
Voice Actor 5,000.00 1 5,000
Panda Crew tiered 8 80,000
Garuda Crew $10,000 5 50,000

This epoch marked the first on the unification of Team Videographer, Team Designer, Team CC, and our YT guy.

4. NFT Council and DAO Board

Members $GRAPE Accounts $GRAPE
NFT Council 5,000 5 25,000
DAO Board 20,000 5 100,000

5. Bulk Payouts

Bulk Payouts $GRAPE
Contests 500,000
Pandas Growth Grant 50,000
Garuda Growth Grant 50,000

GRAPE Awards was terminated.

Do we still have Panda/Garuda grants?

Contests, rewards for events for the whole month

Pandas Growth Grant to promote the growth of the Chinese part of the server. Encourage the creation of the Panda SubDAO and promote inclusivity by organizing events, translations, tutorials, Chinese Social Media Presence, etc.

Garuda Growth Grant ‘’-see above-’’

Summary $GRAPE
Total Coins XXXXXXX
Remaining Coins XXXXXXX
Coins Spent XXXXXXXX

Speak now or forever hold your pee.



are we terminating the crew role?

panda/garuda grant still applicable?

I agree to the above specially the tiered aspect, that’s a great point ! it enforces engagement and motivates more participation.

1 Like

This morning Dean posted that there were 6 in the NFT Council, there seems to be 5 listed here.

1 Like

Just a note to ourselves @DyNite dynite and for anybody wondering: Membership Emissions will now be different and adjusted to the inflation schedule as seen in our documentation: Get involved - and benefit! - Grape Network

1 Like

I know we had a decreased amount of earning for the Community Creators, dropped nearly 20% for our top earners - this month we will also have a huge addition with Creative subDAO joining the CCs - need to probably work out where those subDAOs joining funds and stuff breaks down into it all at a more individual level - one of the things we need to make sure is the individual tier 3 CCs arent getting horribly small amounts


Aye, I combined the budgets for those who joined CC.
My strong recommendation is that you guys would increase your tiers to 4-5 different tiers since it would probably be easier to fit different people into those tiers rather than the 3 your currently have.


Since the creatives has merged with the CC, shouldn’t the existing Creatives allocation be added to pre existing CC allocation?
Plus I think Dynite has a great point, we should also increase the CC tier to 5 tiers


For starters we need to know what the crew stands for, what they offer, what role they play… all these should be accessed before terminating any emissions… if they play no role then they shouldn’t earn.


There are currently 7 members including Dean

1 Like

I overly agree with what Tariq said here. The crew membership role is offered to outstanding grape community members and from the looks of it, they all turn up. As I believe the crew membership role has its own function, I’d say if at all, it’s best the emissions to these members are cut off a bit than for the scraping of the crew membership to commence

Crew role is for people that need to make channels and permissions changes. When we had the emissions cap, we made life easy and just gave Crew role to people that were clearly doing alot of work on Grape. Now that we have removed the cap and developed the tiers in other subDAOs, I propose we stop the emission to the Crew role.

There are currently 21 people with this role – here is the list


After the DAO structure and the council, the crew team role isnt implemeting value anymore to GRAPE, agree on removing the emissions, can keep the vanity role.

1 Like

Yes, I know that Starflash had suggested a lower tier, worth mentioning in our next subDAO

Agree with this, most of the usage for Crew role is overall permission through Discord without the need to contact a team member.

So removing the emission should suffice and focusing more on specific work roles should be more obvious.


I really hope the organizer emissions is re-examined, although it’s has already been stated to the Dao, I’m just dropping this here for documentation purposes.


Noted. Thank you. Please do share with Dynite or myself a revised version of your tiers and proposed amounts when ready.

1 Like

Going to be receiving information today and tomorrow. Will push Jan Emission v1 out as soon as I receive that info, likely 24 hours from now.